Comments on: Some New Numbers http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/ Your funeral. Fri, 08 May 2009 15:47:37 -0700 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6 hourly 1 By: todd. http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1347 todd. Wed, 12 Dec 2007 03:13:12 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1347 Tony, I started to leave that comment. But I was concerned that Adam did know that is the integral sign, and that he'd be all, "No shit, Dr. Mathsalot, thanks for explaining the joke away." Tony, I started to leave that comment. But I was concerned that Adam did know that is the integral sign, and that he’d be all, “No shit, Dr. Mathsalot, thanks for explaining the joke away.”

]]> By: anthony http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1338 anthony Sun, 09 Dec 2007 00:50:24 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1338 Aw, I was expecting a snarky response from todd along the lines of "who doesn't know the long s means the integral?" Then I was going to follow up with "why do we need more terms referring to "7""? But now you've all gone and ruined it. Aw, I was expecting a snarky response from todd along the lines of “who doesn’t know the long s means the integral?” Then I was going to follow up with “why do we need more terms referring to “7″”? But now you’ve all gone and ruined it.

]]> By: Carolyn http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1322 Carolyn Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:40:38 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1322 You're a dork. I love you anyway. You’re a dork. I love you anyway.

]]> By: Molly http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1313 Molly Thu, 29 Nov 2007 19:45:42 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1313 Man. You are a genius. Man. You are a genius.

]]> By: todd. http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1310 todd. Wed, 28 Nov 2007 17:11:27 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1310 That's weird. Just yesterday I defined "a dishonest baker's dozen" to be 11. But hobo's dozen is better. That’s weird. Just yesterday I defined “a dishonest baker’s dozen” to be 11. But hobo’s dozen is better.

]]> By: emily http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1309 emily Wed, 28 Nov 2007 16:12:07 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1309 haha nice, brother. hojousand can be used ir- what? haha nice, brother.

hojousand can be used ir- what?

]]> By: Heather http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1307 Heather Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:13:39 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1307 OMG NICE SURPRISE U HAVE BLOG WOA COOL OMG NICE SURPRISE U HAVE BLOG WOA COOL

]]> By: J http://www.adamconover.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/comment-page-1/#comment-1306 J Wed, 28 Nov 2007 15:06:34 +0000 http://www.tweebiscuit.net/2007/11/28/some-new-numbers/#comment-1306 “Raphael, for the umpteenth time, pick them up or I’m setting them on fucking fire.” "they’re probably going to eat one before they give it to you. Stupid hobos." I "lol'd", as they say on the internets. I've been needing some new numbers lately. “Raphael, for the umpteenth time, pick them up or I’m setting them on fucking fire.”

“they’re probably going to eat one before they give it to you. Stupid hobos.”

I “lol’d”, as they say on the internets. I’ve been needing some new numbers lately.

]]>